AEM V2 Intake Review on Acura RSX Type-S

Saturday, December 10th, 2011 admin

Stephan Papadakis gives an overview of the AEM V2 Intakes on an RSX Type-S. Differrent from an AEM Cold Air Intake, find out the benefits and installation for the AEM V2 on the RSX. Find out more at www.aemonly.com including dyno sheets, installation instructions and more. 18 HP on the Dyno – No Joke! http
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Comments

@Jcastro1992 You can try ours, it’s AEMonly.com

By Jcastro1992 on December 10th, 2011 at 7:30 am

can you give me a legit AEM site


@nvmaddog1 It depends on which filter it is, Dryflow or Oiled. Check which yours is and use the correct cleaner.

@liljdmef Not exactly, but we have seen people use a V2 for a B18 on a CRX, we just can’t guarantee fitment.

Anyone know how to clean the filter on these?

Do they make a v2 for a 89 crx. With a b18c5 swap?

@ComptechTypeS Look at where it made the power, peak power is 18, average is the 5-6 you see. “Heatsoak” on a dyno with poor airflow is one thing, intake temps when rolling on an actual road is another. There’s plenty of air flowing in the engine bay that it’s on a few degrees above ambient once rolling. This intake doesn’t make it’s power by being a “cold Air”, it makes it from the resonant tuning in the tube.

@Crowcaine77 You should watched it on the dyno before “spewing” your own garbage! AEM has a room full of engineers that have already disproved you. Do you have airflow modeling software, a flow bench and a dyno to prove them wrong, or are you a keyboard jockey?

@rockinallday25 We hear it fits but doesn’t make power on them due to the throttle by wire set up.

@rockinallday25 We hear it fits but doesn’t make power on them due to the throttle by wire set up.

@Jasonisawesome3 Nope, it would have to go to the turbo, not the throttle body.

By Jasonisawesome3 on December 10th, 2011 at 12:23 pm

Would there still be room for it if it had a turbo

By rockinallday25 on December 10th, 2011 at 12:25 pm

How come it doesn’t fit the 05 and 06 rsx-s?

By lespaulguitarist92 on December 10th, 2011 at 12:42 pm

@sneekkid it could, but don’t do it.  you would only want clean air comming in, not bad air.

can it be driven without an intake

@TheMrSupermoto Obviously you need to spend less time on the internet because this was posted 9 months ago and you feel the need to go ALL the way back and comment.. Hop off my dick kid

By TheMrSupermoto on December 10th, 2011 at 2:33 pm

@21fuzz21 obviously you need to spend more time studying physics, and less time peruzing the internet

By Skunk2Bandit on December 10th, 2011 at 3:22 pm

Is that a k series engine?

By wtfyourafuckindoosh on December 10th, 2011 at 3:30 pm

@Symbrio 3.2 inline six…

does the smaller diameter tube kinda defeat the purpose? im not a genius car guy just a noob question… lol.

By allisinthepass on December 10th, 2011 at 4:30 pm

@Symbrio its not a v6 u moron its an L6

By asshatnowhere159 on December 10th, 2011 at 5:28 pm

@lukasrz1984 BMW sucks? waaa? saying BMW sucks because intake mods dont increase HP as much is kinda silly. thats like saying honda sucks because exaust upgrades dont increase HP as much as exaust upgrades for camaros.

By xxftwismymottoxx on December 10th, 2011 at 5:53 pm

@21fuzz21 you think sound has nothing to do with airflow? pay closer attention in school kid. look up “rubens tube” you’ll see sound does effect airflow.

By sixstringsensei on December 10th, 2011 at 6:25 pm

Can you point me in the right direction to find out more of the intake, but for a Scion XB 2008+? Thanks!

By fastnight81 on December 10th, 2011 at 6:46 pm

@iHardstyle1 I am almost 100% sure it does… look into it…

 

Leave a Comment

« | Home | »